The Economic Failure of Venezuela
The Economic Failure of Venezuela
Economics Explained
Communism and socialism disaster
Venezuela once the richest country in Latin America, it is now home to the greatest economic downturn for a single country in modern times. Despite having huge oil reserves, the country's output was severely limited, and it also was not a huge help that the country was a member of Opec, a group of oilrich states that basically had a pact to not flood the market with oil to keep prices high. Hugo Chávez took office in 1999 and sought to turn around the inefficiencies in the state's oil company. Chávez kicked the workers out and installed new workers into the company who were loyal to him and his plans for the oil revenues that would flow from the company's oil production. The government did not really do anything to diversify the economy in Venezuela. The government spent so much money that it became cheaper to import something than it was to buy locally. By 2008, all export industries apart from oil had collapsed and there would have been massive unemployment issues, but the government just threw cash at people to make the issues go away.
The story of Venezuela's oil boom doesn't sound too dissimilar from the story of Norway's oil boom. How did one country end up as a poster child for economic responsibility? Norway used its oil wealth for social welfare, the same as Venezuela. Norway did it no far smarter way investing the money into a fund that will continue to generate revenue for the mining operation. A day job is probably fine for a household relying on a single income, but it works in many instances for a company only having one source of revenue is very very reckless. For a nation blind purely on one form of income, it's just a recipe for disaster like we have seen in Venezuela.
Seeman ideologically vs reality
Seeman's economic ideology is the same as that of Venezuela, which deprivatizes the nation and places all industries under governmental control. It caused a severe economic catastrophe in wealthier countries.
Following India's independence, Nehru began nationalising the country by acquiring private businesses and turning them into government organisations, which had a negative impact on the Indian economy.
Hence, my conclusion is that nationalisation never brings money to the government or progress to the country; rather, this ideology always causes economic crises and tragedy; therefore, reject communism and let socialism continue to grow and prosper.
Stay tuned to know more about communism and socialism failure
Comments
Post a Comment